Why it’s smart to trade below your maximum risk

Manage your risk, or it manages you

michael martin martinkronicle

Your max risk per trade is just that – your max. You might consider trading within that risk measurement. Why? Murphy’s Law. Take that into account when you are position sizing your trades. 

You can normalize risk across all instruments so that you can think of each security in terms of risk units, that is, shares or contracts per unit. That’s achieved by calculating the volatility of each instrument. In position sizing this way, you won’t trade one more aggressively than another. They’ll all be the same risk % to your overall account. 

For example, given the prevailing volatilities, 26 contracts of Sugar might be equal to only 6 contracts of Crude Oil in terms of percentage risk to your capital. Each would be a 1% risk unit even though Sugar has 4x plus more contracts than Crude Oil. 

Manage your risk or it will manage you. If you don’t define how much you are willing to lose per trade, eventually big losses will define your career.

Enter our $1,052 Giveaway Contest – It’s Free

Great Trading Articles

Why you should trade risky securities conservatively

Reduce invisible risk and reduce outsized losses

Yoga, time blocking, and risk per trade

Subscribe

martinkronicle soundcloud

subscribe on itunes

Please note: I reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive or off-topic.

2 thoughts on “Why it’s smart to trade below your maximum risk

Comments are closed.